Archives
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
April 1998
|
Mark Muller: Free trade isn't up to the task of making America thrive
Minneapolis Star Tribune
January 25, 2008
By MARK MULLER
In his recent article ("Free trade helps Americans more than it hurts," Jan. 17), Steven Landsburg criticized Republican presidential candidates for pandering to displaced workers in Michigan, counter to the free-trade dogma that he supports. We have benefited greatly from the cheap products that international free trade provides, he asserted. Can't these politicians leave well enough alone and let us all be thankful for everyday low prices? Landsburg is a professor at the University of Rochester in New York. I grew up outside of town there, and it's a region I know well. Were there any suitable jobs in the region, I might never have left. To understand why candidates feel the need to pander about job losses, I suggest that Landsburg take a short drive north and west of the campus. Like many Rust Belt cities, Rochester has suffered shocking urban decay. Certainly, the social upheaval of the 1960s and '70s was a large driver for the urban decline. But like a good Band-Aid, a strong economy has mended these social conflicts in other parts of the country. As Landsburg drives outside the Rochester city limits, he would pass the enormous Kodak manufacturing facilities that once employed my father, my uncle, and for one summer, me. But Kodak and Xerox (also based in Rochester) have struggled in a new global marketplace and have shed local jobs in favor of production elsewhere. In Rochester, my father's generation joked that Kodak was growing so quickly that someone simply needed to walk and chew gum to get a job there. My generation jokes that we might as well have our class reunions in North Carolina because everyone seemed to be moving south for jobs. Traveling west out of Rochester, Landsburg would soon come to several towns well-known for apple production. But since China crushed the market with incredibly cheap apple juice concentrate, the apple industry has languished. Many orchards close to Rochester have become housing developments; some have been replaced for lower-value corn production, and others just lie dormant. And then, just north of the orchards is massive Lake Ontario, which creates the microclimate that allows apples to thrive, as well as the water supply that attracted so much industry in the 19th and 20th centuries. But due to pollution and to the decline in several fish species, commercial fishing no longer exists. Since Rochester isn't using much of the water, corporations and other regions of the country have proposed taking the water somewhere else. Our proud Great Lakes economy has reached the point where selling off natural resources is an economically attractive option. Landsburg implies that policymakers in regions like Rochester should simply let the market work, despite the questionable track record of that strategy. Of course, I get excited about great deals when I'm shopping, but I do take umbrage at a narrowly focused economist criticizing desperately needed local economic-development strategies. We're not going to get very far by selling fast food to each other. Economies need production, whether it is agricultural products, manufactured goods, computer software or tourism. Reducing our economy to exclusively cheap prices denigrates labor, devalues family and community, and ignores quality of life.
Unlike Landsburg, I applaud proposals that bring value back to our communities. Getting government out of the economy does not create a free market -- it just leaves the market to the whims of the multinational corporations. Low prices are not enough. Mark Muller is the director of the Environment and Agriculture program at the Minneapolis-based Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.
NOTICE: In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for research and
educational purposes.
|