Date Published after
before
mm/dd/yyyy

Select a category to display:

Archives
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010

December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009

December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008

December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006

December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005

December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004

December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002

December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001

December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000

December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999

April 1998

Optimism For Clean Energy as Climate Cure Wanes

The New York Times
December 10, 2008
By Tom Zeller Jr.

Email this page

The optimism of global leaders for clean energy technologies appears to be slipping a bit in the face of the global financial situation and the sheer scope of the climate problem — at least as it is reflected in a survey released this week at the global summit on climate change in Poznan, Poland.

Britain’s Guardian newspaper sums it up:

Support for renewable energy technology to fight global warming is weakening in the face of worldwide economic problems and the true scale of the carbon reductions required, a survey published today has suggested.

Figures presented at the U.N. climate talks in Poznan, Poland, show that climate experts have less faith in alternative energy than they did 12 months ago.

The survey shows less support for wind energy, solar power, biofuels, biomass and hydrogen energy as technologies with “high potential” to reduce carbon levels in the atmosphere over the next 25 years.

There was also less support for carbon capture and storage, new nuclear build, small-scale hydropower and natural gas stations as viable ways to hit targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Although in most cases, the decline in optimism for any particular technology — from solar power to wind farming — was a matter of a few percentage points, almost every category saw a drop.

Respondents saying each energy technology has a “high potential” to curb atmospheric carbon dioxide over the next 25 years. See Globescan PowerPoint for full results.

Asked to rate each energy technology’s potential to decrease atmospheric carbon levels over the next 25 years, the number of respondents seeing “high potential” for solar electric, for example, dropped to 66 percent from 74 percent. Some 56 percent saw high potential for land-based wind farms, down from 62 percent last year. And the biggest drop in optimism was for first-generation biofuels from crops. Just 12 percent of respondents saw high potential there, down from 21 percent last year.

The Guardian quotes Eric Whan of Globescan, who said: “As the climate crisis deepens they could be becoming less optimistic that individual technologies may be able to solve the problem.”

What did the experts see as having the highest potential for curbing CO2? Energy conservation and more efficient technology overall. That garnered 88 percent of respondents. (No comparable statistic was available from last year’s poll).

Meanwhile, against the backdrop of the U.N. climate talks, which are aimed at finding a successor agreement to the expiring Kyoto Protocol, the European Union is struggling to reach agreement on its own climate rules — with deep divisions between governments in Eastern Europe (and Italy), and their comparatively wealthy counterparts in the West.

The former say new climate measures being proposed unfairly handicap their still developing economies — an issue that similarly divides rich and poor nations on climate measures across the globe.

Nonetheless, the Globescan survey reveals that nearly three-quarters of the 1,000 experts surveyed agreed that “equitable economic growth and development and significant progress in combating climate change can be achieved at the same time.”

Eleven percent disagreed.

The survey, conducted by Globescan, a Canadian polling firm specializing in excavating opinion among leaders and stakeholders, collected feedback from about 1,000 “climate change decision makers,” in 115 countries through the month of November.

The study had backing from the World Bank, the United Nations Environment Program, the International Union for Conservation of Nature and other organizations.

NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for research and educational purposes.


Email newsletters
Subscribe to IATP's
  • WTO Watch
     View archives
  • Tar Sands Oil Review
     View archives
  • Geneva Update
     View archives
  • Global Food Safety Monitor
     View archives
  • NAFTA Monitor
     View archives


  faceboook

      
Issue directories

Global Food ChallengeGlobal Food Challenge
IATP explains the policies that have caused the food crisis and the solutions we need.

Green ChemistryGreen Chemistry
The Green Chemistry revolution is making safer products and protecting human health and the environment.

Local FoodsLocal Foods
IATP analyzes the key policy and marketplace issues driving local food systems.

NAFTANAFTA
NAFTA leaves a huge footprint on the U.S. and the world. As Washington gears up for the debate, IATP analyzes what's at stake.

WaterWater
From ethanol to privatization, water is a hot issue in trade and agriculture worldwide. Trade Observatory has document and headline collections dedicated to water issues.

IATP blogs
Keep up-to-date on the latest trade issues at Think Forward.