Archives
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
April 1998
|
Anti-American Sentiment Pummels Global-Trade Agenda
The Miami Herald
April 29, 2003
The Miami Herald | By Jane Bussey | April 29, 2003LENGTH: 929 words MIAMI _ Anti-American sentiment in wake of the war in Iraq, fused with the harsh winds of strained international relations, is pounding the once-ambitious global-trade agenda. In recent days, Washington has signaled its displeasure with Chile's antiwar stance by delaying the planned April signing ceremony of a U.S.-Chile trade agreement. The Brazilian press is reporting that diplomats expect the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas to miss its 2005 deadline, perhaps for years, even as Miami's trade community is gearing up to host a regional trade ministers meeting in November. And difficult negotiations for a round of multilateral trade and investment liberalization have been buffeted by new waves of transatlantic discord, throwing into question the success of a World Trade Organization summit scheduled for September. Even the bright spots have clouds. U.S. trade officials say negotiations for a Central American Free Trade Agreement is on target to be wrapped up by the end of the year, but, two weeks ago, trade negotiators meeting in San Salvador were greeted by protesters shredding the American flag and waving Iraqi and Salvadoran banners. And on top of the political issues is the threat of SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome, which has grounded U.S. executives, accustomed to frequent flying to southern China to inspect products coming off America's newest factory floors there. So far, SARS is just a disruption, but months of travel bans could severely strain far-flung supply chains. "SARS reflects what happens when the world becomes such a small place," said Sophia Murphy, trade program director at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy in Minneapolis. But, even without SARS, the U.S. war on terrorism and the growing distance with key European allies have combined to undermine global-trade talks, analysts say. "My view is that the Western security alliance is broken," said Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the International Institute for Economics. "It may be papered over but not fixed. All the economic institutions grew up under this umbrella of common security concerns. Now these economic-cooperation institutions have to stand on their own." Trade ministers from the 146 member nations of the WTO are slated to gather in Cancun, Mexico, in September to showcase advances on brokering rules to liberalize trade and investment, a series of negotiations known as the Doha round. ___ Some of the big decisions were supposed to be behind them, but WTO members have missed four negotiating deadlines on issues including agricultural negotiations, trade-related aspects of intellectual-property rights and the promised access for poor countries to inexpensive medicines like AIDS drugs, implementation issues and special treatment for developing countries. Washington and Paris must now try to see eye to eye on issues like reducing agricultural subsidies after France tried to block the U.S.-led war in Iraq and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld dismissed the opposition as the "old Europe." Aware of the public-relations problems stemming from failed talks, WTO officials are trying to lower expectations for the Cancun meeting. In December 1999, trade negotiators faced the biggest confrontation of the past century on trade when protesters disrupted the WTO meeting in Seattle. That meeting ended in failure, as negotiators could not agree on launching a new round of negotiations. Just after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick argued to a world in shock that global cooperation was the antidote to terrorism, and he managed to thrash out a consensus on launching a new round of trade talks. Promising the poorer countries of the world that this round would bring real progress, negotiators named the Doha round the "development round." ___ The issues raised in the Doha round directly affect negotiations for a Free Trade Area of the Americas, a proposed trade agreement among 34 nations in this hemisphere that has a similar 2005 deadline. At a recent regional trade ministers meeting in Quito, Ecuador, negotiators made no major breakthroughs on deep gulfs over market access, agricultural tariffs and subsidies and other divisive issues. Gaceta Mercantil, a Brazilian daily, recently reported that Brazilian circles in Washington see holdups in WTO talks delaying the conclusion of FTAA talks until 2007. The talks with Central American countries reflect Washington's desire to show results in the hemispheric trade talks. Grant Aldonas, the Commerce undersecretary for international trade, recently reflected on the lack of FTAA progress when he told U.S. textile manufacturers at a Coral Gables, Fla., meeting: "The only countries that are likely to show up are the ones already in the CAFTA process." The most ardent supporters of trade deregulation _ the drive to remove tariffs, rules and barriers that hamper moving capital and goods around the world _ insist that countries will find ways to cooperate and that all previous trade rounds were beset by such difficulties. "Most of the issues that account for the slow work going on within the WTO have to do with issues that predated the Iraq conflict," said Calman J. Cohen, president of the Emergency Committee for American Trade, a trade group in Washington. "Ways will be found to work on trade issues that seem insurmountable now."
NOTICE: In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for research and
educational purposes.
|