Archives
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
April 1998
|
WTO top court again condemns U.S. dumping measure
Reuters
February 5, 2009
By Jonathan Lynn
GENEVA (Reuters) - The World Trade Organization's top court backed the European Union on Wednesday in its challenge of a U.S. method for dealing with unfairly priced imports, confirming a series of previous rulings. The European Union launched the appeal even though it won the original case in October, because the original panel refused to rule on some instances challenged by Brussels. The United States subsequently also appealed. "Given the repeated WTO findings against the use of zeroing by the U.S., the (European) Commission hopes that the U.S. will abandon this practice and fall into line with other WTO members," EU trade spokesman Peter Power said in a statement. An official with the U.S. Trade Representative's Office said the United States was "highly disappointed" with many points of the ruling, but also noted the panel did not accept all the European Union's claims in the appeal. "The United States has previously expressed its concerns about the Appellate Body's findings on zeroing in statements made to the WTO in ... other disputes. We will continue to consult with members of Congress and interested members of the public as we move forward with next steps," the U.S. trade official said. The case had attracted attention as an example of a growing rift between the WTO's dispute panels and its Appellate Body over the extent to which zeroing can be permitted under international trade rules. With the economic crisis fueling fears of protectionism that could deepen the world's recession, trade remedies such as anti-dumping measures to tackle cheap imports are coming under added scrutiny by governments and trade lawyers. In a 166-page report, the Appellate Body overturned many reservations of the original dispute panel, and recommended the United States bring the measures into line with trade law. International trade rules allow countries to impose duties on imports that are sold for less than they cost at home, if they are found to damage businesses in the importing country. The anti-dumping duties are based on the difference between the price in the exporting and importing markets. The United States ignores, or treats as zero, examples where the price is actually higher in the United States than in the exporting country. Critics say that artificially inflates the anti-dumping duty, putting up a higher barrier to trade. The present case, launched in October 2006, involves U.S. anti-dumping measures against imports of European ball bearings, steel products, pasta and chemicals. The United States now accepts that zeroing is inadmissible in new anti-dumping investigations, and did not contest EU arguments involving investigations into imports of chemicals from Finland, Netherlands, Spain and Sweden. But it argues that zeroing should be allowed in reviews of its existing anti-dumping measures, and is pushing in the WTO's Doha round to have zeroing explicitly recognized as permissible. (For the full appellate body report, click on: http:/www.wto.org/english/news_e/news09_e/350abr_e.htm ) (Editing by Elizabeth Piper and Peter Cooney)
NOTICE: In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for research and
educational purposes.
|